‘Amicably settling’ our way to hell


There is a report in The Morung Express today about a murder case in Bhandari and the controversy that has cropped up over a ‘compromise letter’ whereby the accused murderers who had been arrested have been set free. Stupefying, isn't it? This can happen only in Nagaland!

If you read the news report you’ll find so many things that are just so wrong with the entire murder investigation, if you can call it that. But this is not about that particular case per se. It just brings to the fore all the ‘compromising’ and ‘forgiving and forgetting’ that we Nagas have become so dangerously fond of.

The ‘compromise letter’ currently in the spotlight is said to contain words and phrases like ‘mutual understanding’, ‘spirit of forgive and forget’ and ‘amicable settlement’. Of course, it does. All cases in Nagaland, big and small, are ‘amicably settled’ with ‘mutual understanding’ in the spirit of ‘forgive and forget’ – even very serious murder cases such as the one reported which, in other societies, is punishable by life imprisonment or even death.

All too often we find clans and communities negotiating an ‘amicable settlement’ or a ‘forgive and forget’ solution and culprits being allowed to walk scot-free without ever facing the consequences of their actions. Forgiving those who have wronged us is a very fine and Christian thing to do, but a line has to be drawn between matters that can be dismissed on that premise alone and those where wrongdoers have to be punished even if the victim chooses to forgive.

I remember an alleged rape case that had emerged in Dimapur area a few years ago wherein a young college student had been accused of raping a girl. Very soon, concerned clan and village organisations had jumped into the matter, one side contending that it was consensual sex and the other adamant that it was rape. Press releases flew fast and furious for some time and then there was a lull when negotiations were apparently being held. Then came a final press release from a ‘neutral tribal body’ of the concerned area stating that the matter had been ‘amicably settled’ and that no party would be allowed to issue any further statements on the matter. It was a police case and the accused had been arrested but was presumably released on the back of this ‘amicable’ solution.

There was absolutely no clarity on whether it was rape or not, no punishment of the guilty – the boy if he was really guilty or the girl if she had falsely accused - but the matter was laid to rest on a solution which did no resolve anything at all. It only managed to ensure the perpetuation of such wrongdoings.

Then we have the ever increasing cases of rash driving or DUI accidents where victims are either killed or seriously injured and even maimed for life. However, guilty drivers are rarely, or even never ever, suitably punished. Instead, we again find family members, clans and villagers frantically working to save the skin of the person who had recklessly snuffed out or irreparably ruined a life. Very soon there would be a settlement and the matter would then be declared closed. Again, there is no punishment whatsoever of the guilty.

No wonder accidents due to rash driving and driving under the influence of liquor and other substances are increasing at an alarming rate. There is no deterrent to potential offenders, especially young drivers. They know, from example, that someone will save them from facing any consequence.

Concerned families and communities coming together in order to ensure that no simmering resentments or misunderstandings remain which could lead to future problems is a good thing in itself. However, this practice of altogether ‘settling’ all matters in this manner and allowing wrongdoers to walk away without paying for their crimes is doing us absolutely no favours. Rather, it is compounding the growing ills plaguing our society.

We are ‘amicably settling’ our way to complete and total degeneration.




""